Monday, 29 May 2006

Whose side are you on, Johnny?

Filed under: The 4th Term, Timor Leste — Rick Eyre @ 8:50 pm

When John Howard refuses to condemn something that seems to use mere mortals to be worthy of condemnation, it usually means (a) he supports the action; or (b) Liberal voters support the action; or (c) both.

JWH generally makes me cringe with outrage every time I see him interviewed on television, and yesterday morning’s performance on the ABC’s Insiders is no exception. His neanderthal approach to foreign policy is bad enough without the outwardly-inconsistent manner in which he selectively offers opinion on other countries’ internal affairs.

The decision to send Australian troops to Timor Leste last week was the correct one, but was it really appropriate to add:

But clearly, the country [Timor Leste] has not been governed well over the past few years, that’s obvious.

Would he like it if President Gusmao were to point out that Australia has not been well governed over the past ten years?

But the thing that’s missing from Barrie Cassidy’s interview with the Prime Miniature is any condemnation of the forces that are causing all the trouble in Timor Leste and exposing Australian (and New Zealand, Malay and Portuguese) military personnel to risk. What game are you playing, Johnny?

Australia has treated East Timor/Timor Leste like dirt ever since Gough Whitlam turned his back when Indonesia rolled in as Portugal rolled out in 1975. We’ve done our darndest to take their offshore oil fields and we only stepped in to protect them in 1999 when the humanitarian situation became screamingly obvious. We need to have a good look at Australia’s culpability in the current violence.

Tim Anderson’s opinion piece on the Australian intervention in Timor Leste can be found on Evan Jones’ excellent Alert and Alarmed.

Gaining my religion (part II)

Filed under: Religion, Autobiography — Rick Eyre @ 8:09 pm

I believe in God, the Father Almighty, creator of heaven and earth.
I believe in Jesus Christ, God’s only Son, our Lord,
who was conceived by the Holy Spirit,
born of the Virgin Mary,
suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died, and was buried;
he descended to the dead.
On the third day he rose from the dead;
he ascended into heaven,
and is seated at the right hand of the Father;
from there he will come to judge the living and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic Church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and the life everlasting. Amen.
- The Apostle’s Creed, part of the Anglican declaration of Faith.

How can an allegedly intelligent man, so cynical, so satirical, so stubborn as Rick Eyre commit hinself to the Christian faith and maintain most, if not all, of his existing philosophies and beliefs? It’s not as absurd as it may look. In fact, it’s not absurd at all.

I consider that I have always believed in the concept and existence of God, and that, certainly in the last decade or two, I have believed in Christian values - though not necessarily adhered to all of them. My concerns were not with God or with Jesus Christ, but with organised religion. So often in history it has been done badly, especially when invoked as a justification for politics, power or wealth.

But not all religion is like that, and at the parochial level, the church can and does provide an enormous power of good. I can go on in depth about particular issues, but I’m happy to have tied my beliefs to faith in God and Jesus. I believe that with the Anglican church, I am in the right niche, a local church with a strong contemporary family and community focus, a denomination that is part of a global Anglican communion. And a faith that places value on our devotion to God, rather than what God can do for us.

There are some policies of the Sydney diocese of the Anglican Church that I do take issue with - in particular, its opposition to the ordination of women as bishops. The church can only properly flourish if it is able to make the most of all of the talent available among its clergy.

The other question relates to gay clergy. I’m quite undecided on my attitude towards gay clergy - the biblical attitudes to homosexuality are open to a lot of controversy - but whatever happens, I believe that a schism of the Anglican Communion must not happen. Tolerance is the important thing here.

Does my committment to Christianity mean that I have become part of the Religious Right? Not on your proverbial. I believe that the ideal Christian practice is one of humanity, social justice, and equality. While I believe in tolerance, acceptance and engagement with all legitimate faiths, I do have problems with the deregulated “free-enterprise evangelism” that has become so prominent in the US and seems to be permeating the pentecostal movements in Australia and elsewhere.

Religion and politics? There’s room for both - in parallel and ethically consistent streams. I’ll need further blog posts to outline examples of these.

Finally, for now: don’t worry about me turning this blog into a platform for evangelism - that’s not my style. But you can slightly more religious context from time to time, especially when I get into discussing the Episcopal Church of USA and its relationship with the rest of the Anglican Communion.

Monday, 22 May 2006

I’m selling some excess domain names

Filed under: About Now — Rick Eyre @ 5:16 pm

I’ve put a couple of domain names up for auction on eBay. thinkcricket.com, which I was using a couple of years ago but have long since discontinued, is one. The other is worldcupchat.net. I won’t be that deeply involved in the coming FIFA World Cup for it to be of any use to me now. Other people might find it handy.

Links to these items are in the eBay panel at the bottom of this page (please note that there can be a 30-60 minute delay in the bid information you see here). Alternately, you can look for seller reyre59 on eBay.

I’ll be selling some books, magazines and PAL VHS videos on eBay over the coming months - you’ll be able to follow all of my current items on these pages.

Saturday, 6 May 2006

Gaining my religion (part I)

Filed under: Religion, Autobiography — Rick Eyre @ 9:50 pm

In every census from 1986 to 2001 I answered the question asking about my religion with the word “Nil”. When the next census comes around on August 8 this year I will be recording my religious status as “Anglican”.

My committment to Christianity, which took place in the second half of 2005, surprised some of my friends and family, who probably saw it as a reaction to my break-up with Di. But it goes far deeper than that. The fact is that I have never been that far away from the Christian faith.

Let’s go back to the beginning. I was baptised in 1960, when I was a year old, at what is now the Belmont Squash Centre, near Lake Macquarie. In those days it was Belmont Methodist Church. Though I was notionally a Methodist, in real terms that meant little. At scripture time at Marks Point Public School I was in the Methodist class run by Mr Middleton, but for Sunday School I went to the only church in town, the non-denominational Marks Point Mission.

I think Sunday School had a counter-productive effect on me, I can remember being bored stiff by the Old Testament bible stories. Stories of the Middle East two or three thousand years ago just didn’t cut it for me. I didn’t really help that I was the only one in my family who was actually going to church. That I did was due to the interest of my godmother, my auntie Enid, who was (and is) a devout Baptist and took her godmotherly role of looking after my spiritual upbringing seriously.

Nonetheless, when I started high school in 1971 I decided I had had enough of Sunday School and stopped going to church. I then did the teenagerly thing and rebelled against religion. My early teens, in which Prime Minister Gough Whitlam was my hero, saw me take a deep interest in Marxism, having been suckered in by the naive simplicity of John Lennon’s “Imagine” - particularly the “no religion” bit. (Was I really an admirer of Chairman Mao in those days? Yeesh!)

When I was around seventeen/eighteen I was at the peak of my book-reading years, inspired I must say by reading the complete “Lord of the Rings” trilogy in a week during the school holidays. Among the vast array of Penguin Classics that I read during that phase of my life were translations of The Koran, the Bhagavad Gita, some of the Upanishads and a book of Buddhist scriptures. While in no sense was I shopping around for a religion, I believe that reading these books as part of my literary travels has been an invaluable experience in more recent years. None of these books, however, had as profound an impact on me as Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s “Frankenstein”.

There’s probably little else to say about my spirituality until the mid-1980s, my mid twenties. (Even the Methodist Church in Australia was gone by then, merged with the Presbyterians into the Uniting Church.) By that time I was, politically, a Keating Laborite, but sometime around 1985 or 1986 I reached the conclusion that I did actually believe that there was an omnipresent being that governed our universe. My mantra, in response to those who enquired after my faith, was that I “believe in God but not in religion”. For it was the negative effect of religious differences and abuses of power that I saw as being detrimental to society.

There’s a long and involved buildup to this that I won’t go into here, but by the late nineties I realised that I no longer felt the emotion of hatred towards people on a personal level. I know this wasn’t absolute, but much more so than in my younger days. I think that I recognised from that time onward a conscious acceptance of the qualities preached by Jesus.

Nonetheless, I would never have seriously contemplated taking up religion if I hadn’t met Di. In many ways she has been more of an inspiration to me than she is ever likely to acknowledge. When I accompanied her to church at All Saints, Petersham on Good Friday 2000 it was the first time I had set foot inside a church for anything other than a christening, wedding, funeral or election in almost thirty years. I was, however, to remain a casual attendee to church after that, declining to participate in Communion because I saw it as a ritual.

We were married at All Saints, Adara was baptised there, and I was becoming more sympathetic towards the church, especially to its value at the parochial level. Even as our marriage was deteriorating, I was becoming closer to the church. I participated in the Lord’s Supper for the first time on Christmas Day, 2004.

When our marriage came unstuck very rapidly in May 2005, I turned to our minister, Antony Barraclough, for guidance and support. I think initially I was looking for some sort of referral to a church counselling service, but Antony began holding regular bible-reading sessions with me.

After a couple of months, he had won me over. From being a “secular Christian”, sitting on the other side of the fence following Christian values without having the belief in the Gospels, I know was ready to embrace faith in the word of God, as delivered by his Son, Jesus Christ.

Bazz, as everyone calls Antony, has been an excellent source of support and inspiration to me over the past year. I now play an active role in the running of the Sunday morning services, and have revamped the church’s website.

Does this mean that I have abandoned my political beliefs and my philosophical ideals in committing myself to Christianity? Far from it. That’s the subject of my next chapter.

Friday, 5 May 2006

Truth, justice and the American way for kids

Filed under: Mentioned In Dis Patches, USA — Rick Eyre @ 12:47 am

Some essential links you must share with your children:

Wednesday, 3 May 2006

Great moments in sports memorabilia

Filed under: Baseball — Rick Eyre @ 6:37 pm

This card costs ’cause you aren’t supposed to have it’

(Darren Rovell/ESPN.com, 2.5.06)

What a fiasco. How did Kansas City Royals rookie Alex Gordon get his face onto a baseball rookie card when the MLBPA says he hasn’t met the eligibility criteria to qualify to appear on one?

We’ll miss you Scotty

Filed under: USA — Rick Eyre @ 12:32 pm

Tony Snow’s impending appointment as Presidential press secretary is a big leap forward in formalising the Fox News Channel’s role as official public relations agent for White House Halliburton. However, I’ll miss the direct, straight-talking, uncomplicated approach of current press secretary Scott McLellan.

After sergeant schulzing questions about Jorge Walke Arbusto singing The Defence of Fort McHenry in Spanish during the 2000 presidential campaign, Scotty stated the bleeding obvious when the following was put to him at Tuesday’s press briefing:

Q Since the President called for the National Anthem in English alone, do you believe there is no inconsistency in one version of the White House website being in Espaňol?

MR. McCLELLAN: I’m sorry. I’m not sure exactly the connection that you’re trying to make.

Q Well, I just wondered if the National Anthem should be in English alone, why do you have a multilingual White House website?

MR. McCLELLAN: There are people in this country that come from all kinds of different heritages, and we should be celebrating people’s heritage. The President has, going back to his days as governor — maybe you were not paying attention in yesterday’s briefing — has talked about the importance of having an English-plus approach in America. That’s something that he advocated while he was governor, and that says that it’s important for people that come to this country to learn English, to be able to speak English, and to read and write in English. He also recognizes the importance of respect for people’s heritage. And that’s why, as governor, he talked about bilingual programs can be helpful if they’re working to achieve the result of helping people to learn this country’s language.

What a great orator. I just hope that Scotty has a fine future awaiting him at Fox News, or failing that, the media. Goodness knows the time is long overdue for a Republican Jerry Springer!

Tuesday, 2 May 2006

Three years of Mission Accomplished

Filed under: Conflict, History, Iraq, USA — Rick Eyre @ 2:01 am

My fellow Americans: Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed.
- George W Bush, on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln off San Diego, 1.5.03

How much accomplishment does a mission need before it is accomplished?

John Howard Darfur update

Filed under: Human Rights, The 4th Term, Darfur — Rick Eyre @ 1:34 am

It has been eleven months since I posted my last report - in actual fact, a nil return - of John Winston Howard’s public references to Darfur.

Nothing has changed in that regard. Disappointingly, I can only find one reference to “Darfur” in Federal Parliament since the start of this year, a speech in the adjournment debate of the House of Reps on February 28 by Liberal MP Louise Markus, whose electorate in the Blacktown area is home to a large number of Sudanese refugees. Ms Markus took to task an opinion piece in the Daily Telegraph.

Our Immigration Department and its parade of incompetent ministers have copped some bad press, quite rightly, over recent years, but to their credit they have admitted more than 10,000 Sudanese refugees over the past three years. According to DIMIA figures (PDF), in the six months to the end of 2005, a total of 2026 Sudanese settlers arrived in Australia - that’s out of a total of 65,804 from all nations. In the 2004-05 financial year, 5572 Sudanese arrived in Australia under humanitarian settlement programs, and that’s 42% of all humanitarian admissions for that year.

If we’ve done well in accepting Sudanese seeking asylum here, we haven’t been quite so forthcoming in helping to make their homeland more peaceful. We still have the grand total of fifteen (15) Australian Defence Force personnel with the UN Mission in Sudan. Enough for a rugby team without reserves.

We could do a lot better with foreign aid too. According to AusAID’s summary of Australia’s Overseas Aid Program 2005-06, a total of $77 million was projected for aid programs for the whole of Africa. A sub-total for Sudan was not given. Overall, Australia’s ODA (Official Developmental Assistance) for the 2005-06 year was projected at just under $2.5 billion. That’s a total of 0.28% of Gross National Income.

How can we get Little Johnnie to take an interest in this major humanitarian calamity? (And here, by the way, is the latest from IRIN about the African Union’s peace talks. The April 30 deadline has come and gone but the AU has given a 48 hour extension.)

Monday, 1 May 2006

Oh say can you see my eyes? Then my hair’s too short

Filed under: Music — Rick Eyre @ 2:07 am

The tune commonly known as “The Star Spangled Banner” has been around since the 1760s with quite a few sets of lyrics. The most recent, timed for release on May Day 2006, is “Nuestro Himno” - an anthem for the USA’s second largest ethnic group. It hasn’t pleased El Presidente Jorge W Bush, but you can’t make everyone happy, especially an Anglophile neo-con.

Take it away guys:

Amanece, lo veis?, a la luz de la aurora?
lo que tanto aclamamos la noche caer?
sus estrellas sus franjas
flotaban ayer
en el fiero combate
en señal de victoria,
fulgor de lucha, al paso de la libertada.

Por la noche decían:
“Se va defendiendo!”
Oh decid! Despliega aún
Voz a su hermosura estrellada,
sobre tierra de libres,
la bandera sagrada?

Sus estrellas, sus franjas,
la libertad, somos iguales.

Somos hermanos, en nuestro himno.

En el fiero combate en señal de victoria,
Fulgor de lucha, al paso de la libertada.
Mi gente sigue luchando.

Ya es tiempo de romper las cadenas.

Por la noche decían: “!Se va defendiendo!”

Oh decid! Despliega aún su hermosura estrellada
sobre tierra de libres,
la bandera sagrada?

Nuestro Himno is not the first Spanish version of the song whose tune was composed by John Stafford Smith and first published in around 1778 as “To Anacreon In Heaven” (and more about that later). La Bandera de las Estrellas was published in 1919. The Germans did a translation in the 1860s. It’s been translated into Yiddish, and the citizens of American Samoa have recently identified a need to use their own translation:

Aue! se’i e vaai, le malama o ataata mai
Na sisi a’e ma le mimita, i le sesega mai o le vaveao
O ai e ona tosi ma fetu, o alu a’e i taimi vevesi tu
I luga o ‘Olo mata’utia, ma loto toa tausa’afia
O Roketi mumu fa’aafi, o pomu ma fana ma aloi afi
E fa’amaonia i le po atoa, le fu’a o lo’o tu maninoa
Aue! ia tumau le fe’ilafi mai, ma agiagia pea
I eleele o Sa’olotoga, ma Nofoaga o le au totoa.

There’s a translation into Latin of FS Key’s famous ditty, composed while he was a POW on a British warship in 1813 - but it’s only a translation of the third verse!

Surely Mad Mel can commission an Aramaic version for us?

In 1969 at Woodstock, NY, presumably in protest at the lack of a Cherokee translation, Jimi Hendrix performed an electric guitar version of JS Smith’s original score with no lyrics at all.

But back to the original, which had nothing to do with bombs bursting in air, la bandera sagrada, dem soynes makhne iz fartayet in shrek, or even caligata lues expurgatast cruore!

To Anacreon In Heaven has six verses, but as you watch the FS Key rendition being performed at the NBA playoffs, don’t forget to sing the following when they get up to the “O say does the star spangled banner yet wave” bit:

And besides I’ll instruct you,
Like me, to intwine
The Myrtle of Venus
With Bacchus’s Vine.