Monday, 11 September 2006

11 Sep 01, Five years on

Filed under: USA, September 11 — Rick Eyre @ 10:45 pm

Two years ago, I opened my personal recollection of the events in the US on September 11, 2001 with a quote from New York Times columnist Nicholas D.Kristof. Let me repeat it, for it still rings true:

But as we commemorate the anniversary of 9/11, let’s remember that almost as many people are still dying in Darfur every week as died in the World Trade Center attack.
- Nicholas D.Kristof, New York Times, 11 September 2004

We feel for the people of New York City whose lives were disrupted, and in many cases destroyed, by the actions of suicide radical hijackers on September 11, 2001. They were innocent people going about their daily lives. They were residents and workers in a city thought safe from attack. They were victims of an attack so utterly bewildering in its imagination and audacity.

But we are enabled to feel for the people of New York City most of all because their suffering was televised.

Did we feel for the people of Bam, wiped out by an earthquake in December 2003? Did we hold ceremonies to read the names of the residents of Banda Aceh killed by tsunami in December 2004? Did we feel for the people of Tyre in July 2006 as their city was bombed to pieces by a foreign army seeking revenge for the abduction of two soldiers?

Did we feel for the thousands of Iraqi Kurds in 1988, killed by weapons of mass destruction under the direction of our then-ally Saddam Hussein?

For today, enough of politics. Day in, day out, I feel outrage at the politicisation of 11.9.01 by the executives of White House Halliburton. The total bullshit espoused by Rice, Cheney et al on the Sunday talk shows yesterday demonstrates that the US has moved not one millimetre closer to understanding how poisonous their global ideology has been, and still is.

Time for me to step back and reflect with the people of New York, following events on WBAI and WNYC radio online, following the reportage of the prayers and sermons of the truly Christian clergy of the US. Knowing full well that I, and indeed all of us, can do a damn lot better in understanding our world as a whole.

There’s a stack of background reading material Out There of course, but I recommend the Center for Cooperative Research for their exhaustive documentation of known events relating to the events of 11.9.01. And from today’s Sydney Morning Herald, Paul McGeough’s excellent column, the title of which sums the last five years up quite well:

The world offered unity. It was rejected.

Sunday, 10 September 2006

September 11: a centennial

Filed under: Conflict, History, USA, South Africa, September 11 — Rick Eyre @ 10:13 pm

September 11, 1906: Indian-born lawyer and South African resident Mohandas Gandhi spoke in Johannesburg calling for non-violent resistance to racial discrimination, in particular Transvaal’s Asiatic Laws. This week is the centenary of Gandhi’s first satyagraha.

It’s a pity that the date of September 11 has become associated with an audacious act of mass murder. With both events in mind, the Mahatma’s grandson, Arun Gandhi, has submitted that September 11 be observed as a Day of Prayer for Peace and Harmony. There’s more information at the Gandhi Institute, including a PDF document of Arun’s paper “The Duality of September 11“.

Rather more fitting, I think, than the Bushite proclamation of September 11 as Patriot Day.

Tuesday, 14 September 2004

Saddam, er Osama, er…

Filed under: US Election 04, September 11 — Rick Eyre @ 5:41 pm

Irrefutable proof of the linkage between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden on Friday, when The Don, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld, repeatedly got the two mixed up during a National Press Club luncheon in Washington.

Here’s a couple of quotes from the transcript published by the US Department of Defence on their website. Exhibit A:

But if you think about it, that’s not the way the world really was before September 11th. Consider the world of September 10th and before. Two Americans and six others stood on trial by the Taliban in Afghanistan for the crime of preaching their religion. The leader of the opposition Northern Alliance, Massoud, lay dead, his murder ordered by Saddam Hussein — by Osama bin Laden, Taliban’s co- conspirator.

Exhibit B:

Saddam Hussein (sic), if he’s alive, is spending a whale of a lot of time trying to not get caught. And we’ve not seen him on a video since 2001. Now he’s got to be busy. Why is he busy? It’s because of the pressure that’s being put on him.

DONNELLY [John Donnelly, chair of the luncheon]: Mr. Secretary, you said earlier that Saddam Hussein hasn’t done a video for a while. You meant Osama bin Laden, right?

RUMSFELD: I did. I meant that we haven’t seen Osama bin Laden. Thank you.

The 52-minute video of the speech is available on the C-Span website for the next couple of weeks.

Recommended further reading:
The Poetry of DH Rumsfeld - Hart Seely, Slate, 2 April 2003.
Transcript, Dept of Defense news briefing, 12 Feb 2002: The Don’s immortal “known unknowns” speech.

Saturday, 11 September 2004

11 Sep 01, Three years on

Filed under: Conflict, USA, September 11 — Rick Eyre @ 5:57 pm

But as we commemorate the anniversary of 9/11, let’s remember that almost as many people are still dying in Darfur every week as died in the World Trade Center attack.
- Nicholas D.Kristof, New York Times, 11 September 2004

It’s been three years since the most audacious act of international aggression in the last half century. Now, for the first time, I am putting into writing my views about that day.

It was just before 11pm Tuesday night here (Sydney being 14 hours ahead of New York). We’d just finished watching MTV Australia’s trashy “Greatest Hits” half-hour program, and I just about to head off to bed. But before doing so, I switched channels over to Sky News to catch the 11.00 bulletin, and they were showing live pictures of the north tower of the World Trade Centre on fire as the result of a plane crash. A quick flick around the other news channels (CNN International, BBC World, CNBC) showed the same.

A few minutes later, confused reports were starting to emerge of a second plane crashing into the towers. At that point it wasn’t clear how big the planes were. While the first crash could have been dismissed as a horrific navigational or mechanical failure, two planes doing almost the identical suggested something more deliberate.

It was, of course, a confused situation, as observed from the four news channels. BBC flashed up a report saying “at least 6 dead, 1000 injured” which seemed both premature and optimistic. As the reports started coming in that planes across the country were being grounded, CNBC was reporting from the floor of the NYSE that the start of trading was to be delayed. They showed vision of stockbrokers in the Exchange, which is not far from the WTC, all watching the TV screens in horror, thinking possibly of people they knew in those buildings.

Then, a little bit after 11.30 my time, came the next twist, when CNN reported on the bottom of their screen: “Breaking News: Pentagon on fire”. From there it seemed like escalating mayhem: reports of another plane heading for Washington, of a car bomb exploding outside the State Department headquarters. Blame was starting to point towards Kashmiri separatists. Then, the news of a big cloud of dust engulfing the WTC north tower.

On Sky News Australia, by now carrying the American ABC coverage live, a reporter in Manhattan telling anchorman Peter Jennings that the tower had collapsed. Jennings asks: “The front wall has collapsed?”

“No, the tower has collapsed.”

“The tower has collapsed?” asks an incredulous Jennings. He wouldn’t be the only one thinking the same thing. A short while later, more reports of a “mushroom cloud” coming from lower Manhattan. This, as it turned out, was the fall of the South Tower.

Confusion continued to roll. There was no confirmation of the carbomb (which, of course, turned out to be false). A chunk was blasted out of one wing of the Pentagon. A fourth aeroplane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania. President Bush cut short a function in Florida, and with the skies now totally clear, Air Force One was flying… somewhere. And suspicion was moving away from Kashmiris to Palestinians.

The eleventh was now the twelfth of September here. I was following the TV, Di was on the internet chatting to people. One friend of hers was starting to contemplate cancelling a forthcoming trip to the US. The time came around to 1am Wednesday, 11am Tuesday in eastern America. BBC World’s senior presenter Nik Gowing began his shift with vision of the smoke over Manhattan and the rather crass observation, “This may seem like a scene from a Hollywood movie, but in fact it is real…”

At 1.45am I decided that there would hopefully be no new developments, and we went off to bed. My heart was racing though, it was a very tense time. It was the attack on the Pentagon that had me thinking, “Shit, what is going on?”

I got up again at about 5.30, turned the TV on, made sure that nothing new had happened, and went back to bed. At seven, when it was time to get up for the day, Tower 7 of the WTC had not long collapsed. The ad infinitum repeat of footage from earlier had begun on every free-to-air and cable news channel. CNN began using a crawler to list the names of the dead in the four planes, including one of their consultant correspondents. The crawler was here to stay.

Wednesday morning in Australia, and we were greeted with the news that the bland and obscure National Party leader John Anderson was Acting Prime Minister, because John Howard was stuck in Washington! Safe, but stuck.

Wednesday was a gloomy, overcast day in Sydney. The planes flying over our house on their descent to Sydney Airport were at a lower altitude than usual so that they could come in safely under the cloud cover. For a day, I was feeling edgy about every plane that passed over!

Night fell in the US. Bush was in Nebraska, Cheney spent his first night in a Secure Undisclosed Location, and Congress sang “God Bless America” on Capitol Hill. And we were all too shocked, compassionate and sympathetic to be cynical.

My next instalment on this subject will link to coverage and reflections on 11 Sep 01 from a range of perspectives.